
When Nick Denton launched the proto gadget blog Gizmodo in August 2002, it arrived on scene to a milieu of early web confusion. Until then, blogs were low traffic outlets for personal thought-flinging to be visited by friends and perhaps aggregated by Google whenever the content merited further examination. The idea to verticalize the content, add a paid author, accelerate publishing frequency, and churn a profit — well, that was new. So when the controversial Gizmodo launched (laying the foundation for Gawker Media), the self-important digital punditocracy debated this 'commercial experiment' in blogging as a viable, interesting, useful, or scalable business:
Dave Winer: It's such a stale idea. The Web is distributed. Try to get the flow to coalesce in a premeditated way. Not likely to work.
Anil Dash: Will it be profitable? I think it's possible but it's much more likely to break even long-term. Which, for the publishing industry, ain't too bad.
Matt Haughey: It's still too new of a site, but I'm looking forward to seeing how well written it is, and if it keeps me coming back. If so, and it makes the people behind it money while doing it, maybe professional blogging can work afterall.
But even Nick Denton himself had trouble with the idea's extensibility: I can't think of any other sector that works as well as gadgets. Porn is the only other vertical that seems to make sense.
Fast forward 7 years later to August 2009 and Gawker Media is a stable of 8* titles publishing 353 million pageviews per month to over 20 million unique readers. We've delivered over 8.5 billion pageviews across 7 years of newsbreaking and Forbes has called our primordial publication "One of the biggest blogs in the world." Turns out this early adventure in blogging is now one of the most established independent ventures in online publishing. Hope you're enjoying the ride.
[View full size graph : Gawker Media Traffic 2002 - 2009]
*9 for those who like smut.